Key Highlights:
- 🔒 New $1 Barrier: Social media platform X introduces pay-to-play, targeting bots and spam.
- 📱 Enhanced Verification: Mandatory phone checks for tighter security on Platform X.
- 🤨 Crypto Skeptics: Experts debate the $1 fee’s impact on curbing platform abuse.
In a landscape often marred by digital nuisances, Social media platform X 🐦, previously recognized as Twitter, is taking the bull by the horns. This platform, a cornerstone of social media interaction, has introduced a subscription tactic aimed squarely at scam bots and spam, entities that have long sullied the social media experience. But the million-dollar question lingers – is this strategy a stroke of genius or just a drop in the ocean?
🚀 Social Media Platform X’s Bold Strategy Against Online Pests
Kicking off on October 17, this new model was initially rolled out to users in New Zealand and the Philippines, serving as a pilot for what could soon become a global standard.
Here’s the drill: new users from these territories will now have to shell out an annual $1 fee, unlocking the full suite of engagement tools 🛠️ – think posting, liking, replying, reposting, quoting, and saving content. But, the gatekeeping doesn’t end there. Social media platform X is upping the ante with mandatory phone number verification, making sure that every user stands accountable.
The driving force behind these changes? Security and authenticity. This program is engineered to shield the platform from the bots and spammers that lurk in its shadows, known for their disruptive antics and the chaos they breed among genuine interactions.
But here’s the kicker: the subscription isn’t mandatory. Users who opt to keep their wallets shut end up in the spectator’s zone, limited to viewing posts, watching videos, and following others. Essentially, it’s pay-to-play for those wanting to dive into the full experience.
🔥 Our music 🔥
🔍 A New Chapter Under Musk’s Watch?
Post-Musk acquisition, Platform X has been in a state of flux. The tech mogul’s entry heralded a no-holds-barred crackdown on bots and spam, marked by the debut of the paid blue badge verification system. This feature, though divisive, aimed at pruning the fake accounts that have long plagued the platform.
X is so bend on thinking revenue streams will help fight bots. If only they'd look to the obvious solution: follower filters similar to the current notification filter
— okHOTSHOT (@NFTherder) October 18, 2023
No need to deal with any of these $1 "solutions"
💬 Cryptosphere Voices Concerns
Yet, the jury’s still out on this one, especially in the cryptocurrency corridors. The feedback, as it stands, is a mixed bag.
Analyst okHOTSHOT hits hard, expressing, “X is so bent on thinking revenue streams will help fight bots. If only they’d look to the obvious solution: follower filters similar to the current notification filter.“
Echoing these thoughts, CryptoQuant’s Ki Young Ju highlights a potential flaw: the $1 wall is a mere stumbling block for spammers who often make a killing from their underhanded schemes.
In crypto industry, $1 paywall is not sufficient, as shitcoin spammers can generate significantly higher profits from their scams.
— Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) October 18, 2023
Most of the bot accounts nowadays already paid for a checkmark though. pic.twitter.com/ZnzNgz6dEa
— ZachXBT (@zachxbt) October 18, 2023
🔥 Register on Bybit Today and get up to $30,000
Sergio Richi
Editor, Logll Tech News